Author Topic: Ship's deck  (Read 3454 times)

Offline Robert Smith

  • Top Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,695
    • View Profile
Ship's deck
« on: November 15, 2014, 12:07:15 AM »
One picture does not qualify as a ship's deck according to Shipspotting standards. Please guess which picture does not qualify ....

Offline Tomislav Raymondi

  • Top Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,175
    • View Profile
Re: Ship's deck
« Reply #1 on: November 15, 2014, 12:37:19 AM »
Robert both photos qualify, at least technically speaking, one is for a mineral bulk cargo I rather say the hatchcoaming and the other one of a classic cruising ship.

Regards

Tomi.
« Last Edit: November 15, 2014, 01:15:51 AM by Tomislav Raymondi »

Offline Kyle Stubbs

  • Top Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,000
  • Something something Danger Zone.
    • View Profile
    • Puget Ships
Re: Ship's deck
« Reply #2 on: November 15, 2014, 01:35:55 AM »
As a reminder of the site standards regarding ship's deck and interiors:

"1.Do not upload more than six photos to this category, if taken on one voyage. For example: Two ship
"Action speaks louder than words but not nearly as often." -Mark Twain

Offline Robert Smith

  • Top Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,695
    • View Profile
Re: Ship's deck
« Reply #3 on: November 15, 2014, 07:32:33 AM »
Thank you Kyle.
If I understand well, the swimming pool picture would not qualify.
But this swimming pool picture was taken from Shipspotting.
The picture of the bulkcarrier was rejected by Shipspotting.
I'm lost. Can anybody explain why ?

Brgds,
Robert.
« Last Edit: November 15, 2014, 08:16:47 AM by Robert Smith »

Offline Robert Smith

  • Top Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,695
    • View Profile
Re: Ship's deck
« Reply #4 on: November 15, 2014, 12:23:39 PM »
Thank you Ken. I'm not disgruntled but worried about the course this site has taken. I'll send you a PM shortly.

Kind regards,
Robert.

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk