Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Chris Howell

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5
1
Site related news, functions and modules / Re: Photo composition rules
« on: August 28, 2018, 09:56:34 PM »
My only comment is to support the admins, the site is about ships and vessels. As an official photographer for a port I only too well understand the differences, my employers want weird angles, dramatic lighting but for the most part this is inappropriate for a site like this.

What irritates me is the number of posts of crooked horizons, poorly balanced shots, underexposed etc, there are so many programs available so no real excuse.

No one should go on about the admins either, if they delete just suck it up and put something new on instead !

2
Sorry just saw this.

Yes rest in peace and thanks for all his work and postings, loved his ships to the end.

3
Bob

Your right

Must be a difference between a force 7 gale in Europe and off Bluff in NZ !!

4
Site related news, functions and modules / Re: Standing Down
« on: June 29, 2015, 09:19:58 PM »
Hi Ken

You have done the best job possible as I see it, any site this size is a minefield and I hope now we will see more of your oldies and you concentrate on something you are very good at taking ship photos, the whole point of the site !

Enjoy your retirement and keep clicking !!

Best regards

Chris

One final point I would make everything should be in English including comments as this is the international language of the sea and that's right ships are built for the sea.

5
Help and Advice / Re: Slide/transparency Scanner
« on: March 27, 2015, 01:40:13 AM »
HI Russell

I use an EPSON 4870 , since superseded by the V700

These are excellent scanners and you should have no problems.

However remember this is a two part process, scanning is the first , then you have to use photoshop or similar to clean up the marks, scratches and crop and straighten the image.

Slides are tedious to work with but the result usually justifies the result.

Chris

6
Site related news, functions and modules / Re: MYSTERY SHIPS
« on: March 15, 2015, 01:32:34 AM »
You are right Phil

Recently I received yet another request for a hi-res of a photo I have posted, I sent this plus asked a friend to find some colour shots, all time consuming, the result not for the first time, no thank you ...........

Human nature for some is my conclusion.

7
Shipping News and information / M.V.SMART aground
« on: August 20, 2013, 08:23:54 AM »
Bulk Carrier MV Smart Breaking Up After Running Aground in South Africa
By Mike Schuler On August 19, 2013
A bulk carrier has run aground and appears to be breaking up along the east coast of South Africa near Richards Bay.
The 151,000 dwt bulk carrier MV Smart ran aground on a sandbar Monday in 10 meter swells after departing Port Richards Bay. The vessel had finished loading coal at the Richards Bay Coal Terminal (RBCT) earlier Monday.
Photos of the grounded ship show the hull has suffered structural failure at around amidships and is severely sagging.
The National Sea Rescue Institute was alerted of the grounding at about 1:30 p.m. local time. At approximately 4 p.m., the structural integrity of the ship was compromised and the captain gave the order to abandon ship, NSRI said in a statement.
All 23 crew members have been rescued by NSRI helicopter crews.
A source has told us that the vessel started to break in half and at this point may be in two pieces.
SAMSA (South African Maritime safety Authority) are en route to investigate and begin evaluations for salvage, the NSRI statement said.
A local news report said that the vessel was no longer under pilotage and may have experienced engine failure.
http://gcaptain.com/bulk-carrier-mv-smart-aground-richards-bay/


http://www.shipspotting.com/gallery/photo.php?lid=1714117

8
Help and Advice / Re: Help Needed - Manchester Liner?
« on: August 06, 2013, 06:09:53 AM »
Spot on David !

9
Shipping News and information / Re: RENA Official Report
« on: June 29, 2013, 01:10:31 PM »
Latest

Salvage bill for Rena grows
By Jamie Morton
 
5:30 AM Saturday Jun 29, 2013
 
 
One of history's most expensive ship salvage jobs is set to get even costlier, with a major new underwater project to be put on the MV Rena's running tab of $300 million.
The owners and insurers of the container ship have announced plans to remove the Rena's submerged four-storey accommodation block from the wreck on the Astrolabe Reef in the Bay of Plenty.
Neither the owners nor the salvors contracted to chop away the structure could reveal estimates of the operation, which adds to what was this year listed as the third most expensive salvage in the world.
The latest project will kick off in October, two years after the ship struck the reef and spilled 350 tonnes of heavy fuel oil into the ocean.
It comes after concerns had been raised that the block, which housed the ship's bridge, crew quarters, offices and galley, could collapse and send more debris towards the shore.
Captain John Owen, of insurers The Swedish Club, said he understood that people did not want the uncertainty of not knowing when such an event might happen.
"Although there is a considerable cost to removing the accommodation section, we recognise the importance of minimising the effects on the community of the Rena grounding as much as we can."
While yet to lodge a resource consent application, the Rena's owners have sounded their preference for for leaving part of the wreck on the reef after properly containing the site.
Their initial approach had been to leave the accommodation block after making it safe to use as a diving attraction but changed their minds in light of wave action and currents potentially battering it into a hazard. Removing the block is scheduled to take 80 days. Half of that time allows for bad weather and sea conditions, and will begin once a special crane barge arrives from Singapore.
US salvors Resolve Salvage and Fire will cut away sections and lift them on to a barge to transport to the Port of Tauranga and scrapped.
A team of smaller craft at the site will prevent debris reaching the shore. Minimal damage would occur to the reef.
Salvors are meanwhile whittling down the Rena's bow to 1m below the lowest tide mark, removing container wreckage from damaged holds and clearing hundreds of tonnes of debris from the sea floor.
The entire operation - a logistical nightmare which has involved a race to pump Marmite-like oil from fuel holds and cranes plucking away containers stacked in high leaning towers - has now reached the point where nothing of the Rena is visible from above the water.
Assessments of the wreck's environmental, social and cultural impacts are due to be complete by the end of the year, and until then the owners say any decision to lodge a consent application won't be made.
Several iwi groups have gone to the Waitangi Tribunal in a push for the wreck to be completely removed and appeals have been lodged with the Bay of Plenty Regional Council over a temporary suspension of the reef's recognised environmental status.
Long, slow haul
US salvors Resolve Salvage and Fire will remove the accommodation block in two sections by cutting it away from the deck. Each section will be taken by barge to the Port of Tauranga and dismantled for scrap and recycling.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10893642
 
Major part of Rena wreck to be removed
By Jamie Morton
12:45 PM Friday Jun 28, 2013
The huge accommodation block of the wrecked container ship Rena is to be removed, in a major move revealed by the ship's owners and insurers today.
The decision to remove the four-storey block, which contained the Rena's crew quarters, galley, offices and bridge, has been made in advance of any move to apply for a resource consent to leave part of the ship of the seabed.
It comes after concerns had been raised about the possibility the block would degrade or collapse at some time in the future and release debris that could wash up on the shoreline.
The operation, planned to start in August or September, would form another major step in a salvage operation that began when the ship grounded on Astrolabe Reef off the Tauranga coast on October 5, 2011, and has so far cost $300 million.
"Our environmental experts have not identified any environmentally harmful material in the accommodation block," said Captain John Owen of insurers The Swedish Club.
Any debris that might be released and eventually wash ashore would be picked up by the shoreline monitoring and clean-up process that had been put in place, he said.
"However, we understand that people do not want the uncertainty of not knowing when this might happen and how long it could go on for.
"Although there is a considerable cost to removing the accommodation section, we recognise the importance of minimising the effects on the community of the Rena grounding as much as we can.
"We appreciate that the accommodation section would have been of interest to recreational divers, and our initial approach was to consider leaving it as part of the wreck after making it safer for divers/"
"However we could not tell how long it would stay in that condition before the effects of wave action and the strong currents caused it to deteriorate and become a hazard to their safety."
The accommodation block was relatively a much lighter structure than the hull of the Rena and had no direct contact with Astrolabe Reef, therefore coming with just minimal risk of causing damage to the reef, the insurers said.
US salvors Resolve Salvage and Fire, which had been tasked with cutting the ship's bow to 1m below the shoreline, would remove the accommodation block in two sections by means of oblique chain cutting parallel to the main deck.
The operation is expected to take up to 80 days, including 40 days allowance for poor weather and sea conditions, and cutting was expected to begin in October following the arrival of an additional crane barge from Singapore.
Once each section is cut away, it will be lifted onto a third barge for transport to Port of Tauranga. Once in port, the sections would be dismantled for scrap and, where possible, recycling.
A team of smaller craft would be stationed at the reef to collect any debris released during the removal operation, to prevent material reaching the shore.
During the dismantling phase steps will be in place to prevent any discharges into the environment.
In the meantime, the salvors would continue with the work to reduce the bow section where the ship ran aground near the highest part of the reef.
All of the bow section that was above the water line has now been removed and the aim is to reduce it down to at least 1 metre below the lowest tide mark.
Resolve was also working to recover container wreckage and other cargo from the debris field between the stern and bow sections, of which 650 tonnes has already been removed.
Debris from cargo hold four was being removed to allow access to two containers of plastic beads originally at the bottom of that hold.
Both containers had been located, in a damaged condition; one has been emptied completely and the other container was being worked on.
Dive surveys of cargo holds five and six would then be conducted to try and locate and identify the state of four other containers of interest.
Bay of Plenty Regional Council chief executive Mary-Anne MacLeod voiced her support to remove the ship's accomodation block.
"The removal of the accommodation block addresses a concern we had about when the contents of the block might escape and how they would be dealt with," she said.
"Its removal from the reef will greatly reduce the risk of further debris being released into the coastal environment."
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10893564

10
Help and Advice / Re: WARSHIP PREFIX for CHINA and CHILE
« on: February 21, 2013, 09:27:01 PM »
Thanks for feedback

PLAN then for CHINA

and

CNS for CHile

11
Help and Advice / Re: WARSHIP PREFIX for CHINA and CHILE
« on: February 20, 2013, 06:02:48 PM »
Thanks

PLAN looks logical, but where does MSA fit in as per site guidlines for China ?

12
Help and Advice / WARSHIP PREFIX for CHINA and CHILE
« on: February 20, 2013, 09:07:06 AM »
Can anyone help with correct prefix for CHINA for naval craft.

It is not ROCS this is for TAIWAN only.

Also CHILE, they may not have an offical prefix though.

13
Shipping News and information / Re: SD14 in European waters....
« on: February 13, 2013, 07:25:02 PM »
As of yesterday ISR Fariplay have her as still in service, no notation yet to be broken up, which they put in red.

14
Shipping News and information / Re: Emma Maersk in trouble
« on: February 03, 2013, 02:33:38 AM »
02 February 2013, 17:57  Lloyds List
 
by Janet Porter
 
EMMA Maersk, one of the world

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 5
SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk