Messages

31

Site related news, functions and modules / Abandonment private contribution of my photographs.

« on: May 30, 2016, 08:03:15 PM »

Dear managers. I have taken the norm not provide more my photographs to your site. Reasons: I have seen mine deleted photos from equal conditions in others that remain on your site, this led to a post on your forum which I am still waiting for an answer when I have shown what I raise, so I think a lack of respect to the ignore what wont. I know there are rules and should be respected, but if so, it required from everyone equally. Abandonment that site for that reason and because I see many privileges in some shipspotter others do not have. Sorry because it is an interesting web and there are friends of mine members whom I admire and respect. I keep my nick if the administration will allow me, otherwise you can do what most want.


Estimados administradores. He tomado la norma de no aportar mas mis fotograf

32

Shipping News and information / Re: KS

« on: May 01, 2016, 12:31:51 PM »

thank you.

33

Shipping News and information / KS

« on: April 29, 2016, 05:48:54 PM »

Greetings. Can someone tell me which are the KS letters appearing in the description of some of my photos?

Saludos. Alguien puede decirme que son las letras KS que aparecen en la descripci

34

Shipping News and information / Re: administrative policy.

« on: March 18, 2016, 08:18:16 AM »

http://www.shipspotting.com/gallery/photo.php?lid=2426530

This is the photo in question.

35

Shipping News and information / Re: administrative policy.

« on: March 18, 2016, 08:15:43 AM »

Seeing this picture and its high water mark, I keep wondering why my watermark not long ago accepted a management ?. This issue is already clear, but I would like an administrator explain to me why accept this photo with the watermark size exceeds mine.

36

Shipping News and information / Re: administrative policy.

« on: February 20, 2016, 12:26:20 AM »

Again, the issue is already clear to Ken Smith, so I will end it.

37

Shipping News and information / Re: administrative policy.

« on: February 19, 2016, 10:47:14 PM »

I continue on this site because I like the pictures and the popularity you have, otherwise you do not agree with what happened, not cut, does not courageous. I just hope justice is more when it comes to taking action. Greetings to all and I will end the issue, because I came to terms with Ken Smith.

38

Shipping News and information / Re: administrative policy.

« on: February 18, 2016, 08:43:58 PM »

I accept half, and I say this because I've seen pictures of other brands spotter with larger water than I had been using and managing the web has said nothing. So far I agree, but I am unhappy with your policy on the web.
Although I would like to know that answer gives me these pictures and their watermarks.
http://www.shipspotting.com/gallery/photo.php?lid=2409176
http://www.shipspotting.com/gallery/photo.php?lid=2211194
However, thank you very much for your attention. I will continue to participate on the web but I wish they were more fair in their policy.

39

Shipping News and information / Re: administrative policy.

« on: February 18, 2016, 02:20:05 PM »

It seems that the only watermark that causes problems is mine. These photographs have a watermark larger than mine and yet managers lords do not say anything about it. Sorry for the spotter, but if there should be equal justice for all.

http://www.shipspotting.com/gallery/photo.php?lid=2409176
http://www.shipspotting.com/gallery/photo.php?lid=2211194

I hope a coherent explanation from managers.

40

Shipping News and information / Re: administrative policy.

« on: February 18, 2016, 12:41:08 PM »

http://www.shipspotting.com/gallery/photo.php?lid=2408864
Same ship, same watermark, same size and is not deleted. Honestly, it does not seem fair that I have deleted some pictures where it is clear that they have the same size of watermark and do not interfere at all in the image of the ship.

41

Shipping News and information / Re: administrative policy.

« on: February 18, 2016, 12:38:21 PM »

http://www.shipspotting.com/gallery/photo.php?lid=2410975
After receiving several of my photographs accepted on this website, I found that all bear the same size in the watermark, and this photograph does not interfere with anything in the image of the ship.

42

Shipping News and information / Re: administrative policy.

« on: February 18, 2016, 08:27:48 AM »

I have deleted four photographs that do not spoil anything capture and have the same watermark you've used since about April 2015. So, I ask,
that since that time I did not clearance about it?
when using this criterion will have to erase the 200 photographs in which I am taking this watermark, you're going to delete?

Ya me han borrado cuatro fotografias que no estropean en nada la captura y tienen la misma marca de agua que vengo usando desde aproximadamente abril de 2015. Entonces, pregunto,
por que desde esa fecha no se me hizo un aclaramiento al respecto?
si usan este criterio tendran que borrar las aproximadamente 200 fotografias en las que hago uso de esta marca de agua, vais a borrarlas?

43

Shipping News and information / Re: administrative policy.

« on: February 17, 2016, 06:35:55 PM »

For now I will suspend my activities until someone explain to me taking this decision after being publishing my images with the same watermark for quite a time and never made me a warning about it.


De momento voy a suspender mis actividades hasta que alguien me explique por que toman esta decisi

44

Shipping News and information / administrative policy.

« on: February 17, 2016, 06:24:42 PM »

I ask gentlemen managers. Took more than a year hanging pictures in your web with my watermark, since yesterday I have posted are considered to clear because of the watermark according to your discretion, I ask of you are going to delete all ?, this is new? or what happens ?. every day I am disappointed over the policy shispotting. If you delete the images mentioned bearing the same watermark that I've been hanging for a while, then I will retire from the web, so simple. No it is this change in policy. Then I see photos above are a mess and remain active on the web. Nothing, I expect clarification.
http://www.shipspotting.com/gallery/photo.php?lid=2410081
http://www.shipspotting.com/gallery/photo.php?lid=2409006
http://www.shipspotting.com/gallery/photo.php?lid=2410392
 

45

Site related news, functions and modules / Re: Photographs on this site

« on: May 03, 2015, 02:21:18 PM »

I agree with what arises in principle.
What more interested in the photo or the ship?
Based on the policy of the web, I have seen terrible pictures that do not delete the admin and pictures of me that are better able've seen disappear. For example, some colque days ago one of the F105 frigate and me have been deleted because according to the admin was dark, because I do not agree, pictured were visible to the welding helmet lines. Anyway, I think a great web, but I think there should be more fair when you delete a picture and let us both favoritism.
Work for the love of sailing, not to see who makes the best photo.

Rgds Carlos Go