Author Topic: "Malaccamax" container carriers  (Read 5447 times)

Offline Daniel Carlsson

  • Not too shy to talk
  • *
  • Posts: 27
    • View Profile
"Malaccamax" container carriers
« on: December 16, 2009, 10:32:04 AM »
Anyone heard of the "Malaccamax" container carriers?
I saw a note about it somewhere sometime, but don't remember anymore.
Best Regards

Daniel Carlsson

Guest

  • Guest
Re: "Malaccamax" container carriers
« Reply #1 on: December 16, 2009, 10:37:50 AM »
Hi Daniel

Courtesy of Wikipedia @ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malaccamax

Malaccamax is a naval architecture term for the largest size of ship capable of fitting through the 25 metres (82 ft)-deep Strait of Malacca. Because the Sunda Strait is even shallower at 20 metres (66 ft) minimum depth, a post-Malaccamax ship would need to use even longer alternate routes such as:

    * Lombok Strait, Makassar Strait, Sibutu Passage and Mindoro Strait
    * Ombai Strait, Banda Sea, Lifamatola Strait between the Sula Islands and Obi Islands, and Molucca Sea
    * around Australia

or artificially excavated new routes such as:

    * deepening the Strait of Malacca, specifically at its minimum depth in the Singapore Strait
    * the proposed Kra Canal, which however would take much more excavation

Bulk carriers and supertankers have been built to this size, and the term is chosen for very large crude carriers (VLCC). Not constructed yet but envisioned, a Malaccamax container ship would be 470 m long and 60 m wide, with 20 m of draft with a 300,000 metric tons deadweight (DWT) for a capacity of 18,000 twenty-foot equivalent units (TEU). The ports growth requirements could be leading to the creation of new terminals dedicated to those ships.

Similar terms of Panamax, Suezmax and Seawaymax are used for the largest ships capable of fitting through the Panama Canal, the Suez Canal and Saint Lawrence Seaway, respectively. Aframax tankers are those with a deadweight tonnage of 80,000 to 120,000.

Offline Fotojoe

  • Home away from home
  • ****
  • Posts: 294
    • View Profile
Re: "Malaccamax" container carriers
« Reply #2 on: December 16, 2009, 10:39:36 AM »
That was a study of a containership which dimensions, especially draft, were designed to just allow her to pass the Malacca strait in laden condition.

Offline Phil English

  • Top Poster
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,492
    • View Profile
Re: "Malaccamax" container carriers
« Reply #3 on: December 16, 2009, 01:05:48 PM »
The Wikipedia article is largely correct but what it doesn't really make clear is that the term "Malaccamax" is specific to the tanker market, applying to tankers built to the Malacca Strait dimensions. Whether the term will be universally applied to envisaged container ships that might get built to these dimensions is subject to conjecture.

Brgds
Phil

Offline Daniel Carlsson

  • Not too shy to talk
  • *
  • Posts: 27
    • View Profile
Re: "Malaccamax" container carriers
« Reply #4 on: December 17, 2009, 09:39:53 AM »
I thought that was strange as well.
Tanker-design applied to cont-ships.
Best Regards

Daniel Carlsson

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk