ShipSpotting.com
Login: Lost Password? SIGN UP
Ship Photo Search
Advanced Search
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Laust Maersk  (Read 1064 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
MO Roy
Just can't stay away
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 112


View Profile
« on: June 30, 2020, 04:28:57 pm »

Can anybody advise about the IMO-number of the first Laust Maersk of 1957/1958, Built Odense with yard number 141.
She had a collision with Alcoa Pioneer in 1961 and sank as a consequence.
Thanks in advance.
Cheers,
Roy
Report to moderator   Logged
Henk Jungerius
Just popping in

Offline Offline

Posts: 3


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: June 30, 2020, 05:17:27 pm »

Hallo Roy;
Found this in Shipsnostalgia:

IMO 5613842 , Dead.
Ship Type : General Cargo Ship.
Dim : L x B - 151.5 / 139.0 x 19.5 mtr.
Built in 1957 by Odense Staalskibsværtft A/S Odense Denmark as " LAUST MÆRSK " for A/S D/S Svendborg & D/S af 1912 A/S ( A.P.Møller Mærsk A/S Copenhagen as manager ) Copenhagen Denmark.

Tonnage : grt / nrt / tdw - 6.419 / -.--- / 9.690.
Main Engine : B&W 9-74-VTBF-160 - 12.500 ihp.

1961 Sank after collision With " Alcoa Pioneer " of Kannon Saki Tokyo Bay Japan.

By Bno Senior Member.
Kind Regards
Henk
Report to moderator   Logged
MO Roy
Just can't stay away
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 112


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: June 30, 2020, 05:24:46 pm »

Hoi Henk,
Dank je wel / Thanks for your swift reaction.
She was the only Laust without IMO in my list.
Cheers,
Roy
Report to moderator   Logged
ChasB46
Top Poster
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 889


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: June 30, 2020, 05:49:23 pm »

I believe this is Miramar (Rob Haworth) ID/filing number not IMO you have been given. Your original lack of a number is correct. IMO not in existence 1957
Other members may correct me but I believe LLoyds introduced 6 figure code number in 1963 and then modified to 7 figures in 1969. The latter numbers were adopted by IMO in 1987.
Report to moderator   Logged
davidships
Webmaster
Top Poster
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2,066



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: July 01, 2020, 02:58:32 am »

Yes, that's right Chas. This is a Miramar made-up data reference number (it's Rodger H, by the way).  So, yes, this ship should not show an IMO number.
Report to moderator   Logged
ChasB46
Top Poster
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 889


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: July 01, 2020, 09:57:39 am »

Thank you Davidships and apologies to Rodger.I should have known better as I did get replies to my Q's to him a few years ago. Rod or Rob,I'll fall back on the age excuse.
Report to moderator   Logged
Henk de Winde
Just can't stay away
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 100



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: July 01, 2020, 02:26:28 pm »

Her last registration number in Lloyds Register was 19409. In fact her alphabetic following number in the 1961/1962 registration.
Report to moderator   Logged
MO Roy
Just can't stay away
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 112


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: July 01, 2020, 11:27:26 pm »

Thanks Gents,
In that case I will again remove the number.
Don't fancy very much these fake IMO-numbers.
Cheers,
Roy
Report to moderator   Logged
pieter melissen
Photo Corrections
Home away from home
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 336


View Profile WWW
« Reply #8 on: July 02, 2020, 06:19:05 am »

On the other hand there is no harm in keeping the Miramar number with the ship for future reference. It will not guide you to any other ship.
Report to moderator   Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Page created in 0.041 seconds with 20 queries.
Copyright © 2010 All rights reserved