ShipSpotting.com
Login: Lost Password? SIGN UP
Ship Photo Search
Advanced Search
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10
 21 
 on: December 08, 2018, 01:08:16 pm 
Started by Arnes - Last post by Bob Scott
Simon: I suppose my problem with this site is that I seem to be in a minority here in that I have had a lifelong (hobby and professional) keen interest in ships, their ownership, their histories and how they work. Photography is merely a tool that I have employed in following my hobby. It would seem we must agree to differ on this subject.

 22 
 on: December 08, 2018, 12:15:11 pm 
Started by Arnes - Last post by simonwp
In a way Bob, that's the point. This site is principally a photograph site, not a ship history site. It's great when people like you do post history, but it shouldn't be a requirement, just optional.

 23 
 on: December 08, 2018, 10:46:19 am 
Started by Arnes - Last post by Bob Scott
You can post a lot more photos much more quickly when you don't bother to include any extra info! I agree with Arnes

 24 
 on: December 08, 2018, 10:07:35 am 
Started by Arnes - Last post by simonwp
I am currently adding a lot of scanned older slides. I add all the information the site requires, but to add a lot of additional information would take too much time. When I look at a photograph and need more information, I look it up myself. I don't rely on someone else to have done it for me. There are plenty of sites, such as Equasis, and Miramar, which have all the information. I use them if I want more information. Basics, such as date, location, and IMO if applicable, are all that are needed on here. If people add more information, of course, it is very much welcomed, but it should be optional, not a requirement. Otherwise it will take too long to upload photographs, and people will stop posting.

 25 
 on: December 08, 2018, 09:26:40 am 
Started by Arnes - Last post by Tomas Østberg- Jacobsen
I used to add lots of info back in the days, but nowadays nobody seems to bother whatsoever, so i just add the bare facts.

 26 
 on: December 08, 2018, 03:34:16 am 
Started by Arnes - Last post by Paul Finnigan
The only requirement is to add the location in the description if the location is not in the drop down box.As for the ships history most members don't have that info available to them.

 27 
 on: December 08, 2018, 12:34:13 am 
Started by Arnes - Last post by Arnes
Something that has been annoying me for years, is that information about the ships is very small. When you enter (push) a photo, you would like to see something else than "entering Rotterdam" or "arriving Sevilla" or "leaving Genoa". To add a photo on this site, you need a lot of information. Seems like someone mean it take too long time to add decent vesselhistory. If they have IMO, they also have ship's history. Why not add some of it, then we don't have to search forward and back to find actual ships history. It is NOT enough with IMO. Hope someone understand what I mean.

 28 
 on: December 07, 2018, 09:56:21 pm 
Started by davidships - Last post by davidships
This topic has been moved to Help and Advice.

http://forum.shipspotting.com/index.php?topic=16409.0

 29 
 on: December 07, 2018, 09:55:16 pm 
Started by davidships - Last post by davidships
This topic has been moved to Help and Advice.

http://forum.shipspotting.com/index.php?topic=16412.0

 30 
 on: December 07, 2018, 07:50:39 pm 
Started by Paul Bradshaw - Last post by Tristin Woolf
She has shown back up on AIS, currently about 260 miles west of Casablanca.

ETA Aliaga 16 Dec 13:00 UTC+3

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 10

Powered by SMF 1.1.11 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC
Page created in 0.087 seconds with 16 queries.
Copyright © 2010 All rights reserved